Home › Health › Hearing

We Tested Every Hearing Aid in the UK. There's One Worth Buying.

Published by Healthy Living Digest  |  Health  |  Last update: Jun 4  |  👁 18,402  |  📖 5 min

It started with a letter from a reader.

A 74-year-old man from Yorkshire had been quoted £3,995 for a pair of hearing aids. He was living on his State Pension, and his NHS letter said the wait was eighteen months.

"I paid my National Insurance every week for 41 years," he wrote. "And the one thing I actually need now, they tell me to wait or pay a fortune."

So we decided to look into it properly. Not one option, but all of them.

We spoke to four audiologists, two of whom have since left the high street retail trade. We read the manufacturer invoices. We tested the cheap Amazon devices. We sat through the clinic sales pitch.

And we looked at what the NHS actually pays for the very same hearing aids sold on the high street.

We went in assuming "you get what you pay for." We came out with something different.

Why people wait too long

When we asked people why they'd waited years to act, the answers were rarely about the hearing itself. They were about something harder to admit.

"You start nodding along," one 71-year-old told us. "Everybody laughs, so you laugh too. You have no idea what was funny. You just don't want to be the one who says 'what' for the fourth time."

One phrase came up again and again. The wife says something. He says "what?" She says it again. He still doesn't catch it.

And then comes the line that everyone said cuts the deepest:

"Never mind. It wasn't important."

It's a small thing. But hear it enough times and a man starts to disappear from his own house. That, more than the price, is what finally makes people act.

The NHS does not move quickly

NHS hearing aids are free. That much is true, and it's a good thing. But "free" comes with a wait, and the wait is the problem.

Readers told us the same story over and over. A referral from the GP. Then a hearing test. Then a fitting appointment. The whole thing can stretch past a year, and in some areas closer to eighteen months.

One person who'd worked inside NHS audiology told us why.

"It's not that the staff don't care. They're stretched. The funding hasn't kept pace with the number of people who need help. So you join the queue, and the queue is long."

The devices themselves are decent, the behind-the-ear type, free batteries from the clinic. But you wait, and many people we heard from simply couldn't face another year of nodding along at the dinner table.

The cheap ones on Amazon

Search Amazon and you'll find "hearing aids" for £29. We bought several and tested them. Every audiologist had warned us, and they were right.

Most of those cheap devices are not hearing aids. They're amplifiers. And that difference was the most important thing we learned in six months.

An amplifier just makes everything louder at once. The voice, the traffic, the dishes in the sink, your own chewing. The voice you wanted ends up buried under a wall of noise that's also been turned up.

A real hearing aid has a digital chip that separates speech from background. That chip is most of the ~£80 in components inside a real device. A £29 Amazon unit doesn't contain one.

"If you tried the Amazon route and gave up," one audiologist told us, "you never actually tried a hearing aid. Please don't let that close the door."

The expensive clinics

We went to the high street clinics next, the names you see on every parade of shops. The hearing test is often free. Then the recommendation arrives, and it's almost always the top-of-the-range model.

The quotes ran from £2,500 to nearly £4,000 a pair.

"The commission structure is the part the public doesn't see," one of the audiologists who'd left told us. "The person fitting you earns a percentage of what you walk out paying."

So we asked the question that changed the investigation. What does the device itself cost to make?

Backed by the invoices we were shown, the components, receiver, microphone, chip, come to around £80.

So where does the other £3,900 go? The lease on the high street. The sales staff. The area manager. The telly adverts. The commission.

You're not paying £4,000 for £4,000 of technology. You're paying for everything that surrounds it.

Costco is the honest exception on price, but it needs a membership, an appointment booked weeks out, and in-person visits only. Good value, but gated.

What the same hearing aid really costs

The NHS is the largest single buyer of hearing aids in the country. It buys the same premium devices, from the same manufacturers, that the clinics sell.

The NHS pays an average of about £85 per hearing aid.

The same device. The same manufacturer. A clinic sells it to your father for thirty to forty times that.

The NHS can do it because it buys in enormous volume and cuts out the retail markup. No lease, no commission, no area manager in the price.

Which left us with one question. If the NHS can do it for under £100, why can't an ordinary person buy one near that price, without the eighteen month wait?

The £149 pair that surprised us

A change in the rules a few years ago let companies sell genuine hearing aids directly to the public, without a clinic in the middle.

One name kept showing up in our reader mail: Smart Hearing, a rechargeable in-ear pair for £149.

We were sceptical. £149 sounded close to the Amazon junk we'd just warned about. So we had it examined and tested it on real people.

Inside is the same kind of chip the expensive ones use, the part that picks out the voice you're listening to and pushes the background noise down. Not the cheap amplifier trick of just turning everything up at once. The receivers are made by Knowles, a supplier whose components show up in devices costing many times more.

It's registered with the MHRA as a medical device, the same category as the aids sold in clinics. That registration isn't something you can just buy, you have to meet the quality and safety standards to get it. The Amazon amplifiers don't have it. Smart Hearing does.

It was started by a man whose own father, in his seventies and on a fixed income, couldn't face clinic prices and couldn't bear the wait.

Same components as the big brands, bought in volume, shipped from a warehouse here in the UK. No clinic, no commission, no area manager in the price. Closer to the way the NHS buys than the way the high street sells.

The part that surprised us most wasn't the price, it was the support. We emailed the company with technical questions, expecting a chatbot. A woman named Diane wrote back within a few hours. Specific, detailed, no template. The kind of help you'd hope to get from a clinic, without the clinic.

There's a 45-day trial at home. If you don't like them, you just send them back. And they guarantee a two-year lifespan, which works out at around 20p a day. Put like that, it's nearly as cheap as the NHS, without the wait.

Then we did the test that mattered most. We put a Smart Hearing aid in one ear and a £3,995 clinic device in the other.

We couldn't tell the difference.

To be precise: these are made for the mild-to-moderate age-related loss that the large majority of people actually have. Not a fix for severe loss, and the company says so plainly.

One thing worth passing on, because it nearly made some people give up. The first day or two, sound can seem sharp. One man nearly put them back in the box on day three.

That's normal. A brain that's been missing sounds for years needs a few days to adjust. The ones who pushed through the first week almost always called it the best £149 they'd spent. That's why the trial runs 45 days at home.

What the people who tried them told us:

Our honest advice

After six months of testing, reading the invoices, and talking to hundreds of people who'd been through it, here's what we tell everyone who asks.

If your hearing loss is severe or profound, go to a private clinic. You need the custom mould and the fitting, and for that level of loss it's worth the money. You'll pay for it, but you'll get the aftercare too.

If you can face the NHS wait, it's free, and that's a fair option. But here's the honest thing we kept coming back to. Smart Hearing guarantees a two-year lifespan, and at £149 that works out at around 20p a day. That's nearly free too, without the eighteen month queue. With a 45-day trial at home on top of that, we struggled to find a good reason not to at least try it first.

But if you're like most people we spoke to, who have the normal age-related loss, can't justify thousands of pounds, and don't want to waste money on Amazon rubbish that whistles and screeches, try Smart Hearing first.

£149. The same core technology as the clinic devices. A 45-day trial at home. If they don't work for you, you just send them back. There's almost no reason not to try.

One reader told us about her father. 84 years old. Stubborn as they come. Wouldn't wear the chemist's aids. Wouldn't pay £4,500 at a clinic. For years he just went quiet at the dinner table.

She ordered him a pair as a last try. He's worn them every day since. "Should've done this years ago," he told her last week.

And the man from Yorkshire, the one whose letter started all of this, tried the £149 pair too. A few weeks later he wrote back one line:

"My wife stopped saying 'never mind.' I didn't know how much I'd missed that until it came back."

Comments (6)