Home › Health › We Asked 3 Senior Audiologists to Rank Every UK Hearing Aid

We Asked 3 Senior Audiologists to Rank Every Hearing Aid Option in the UK. Here Are Their Results.

An investigation by Healthy Living Digest  |  Health  |  Last update: Apr 6  |  👁 12,402  |  📖 5 min

Finding honest advice about hearing aids is nearly impossible. Every audiologist you meet works for a company that sells them.

Every recommendation comes with a commission attached.

So we contacted dozens of retired and independent audiologists and asked them to do something simple: rank every major hearing aid option in the UK, from best to worst, for someone with mild to moderate hearing loss.

Most refused. Some said their former employers would take legal action.

Others said the industry would blacklist them.

Three agreed. All retired.

Between them, 85 years of clinical experience across NHS, Boots, Specsavers, and private clinics. We interviewed them separately.

They didn't see each other's rankings until this article was published.

Their rankings were remarkably similar. Their reasons were even more revealing.

Skip to the combined ranking and conclusion →

Audiologist 1

Dr. Susan Whitfield

27 years. Former NHS senior audiologist and Specsavers consultant. Retired. Volunteers at a hearing charity.

"I'm going to give a different answer to what you'd expect. Because I spent twenty years treating severe hearing loss.

And for severe loss, there is one hearing aid that is genuinely better than everything else: the Phonak Audéo."

"The speech-in-noise processing is extraordinary. In a noisy boardroom, a packed restaurant, a busy train station — Phonak handles it better than anything I've ever tested.

For patients with severe loss, who need every decibel of clarity they can get, I wouldn't recommend anything else. It is the best hearing aid technology in the world."

"But here's what nobody in the industry will tell you. About 80% of people with hearing loss have mild to moderate loss.

And for mild to moderate, you do not need a Phonak. You don't need Oticon.

You don't need anything costing £3,000. It's complete overkill."

"Since 2025, you can buy proper hearing aids over the counter in the UK. Same Knowles receivers as Boots and Specsavers.

Same processing chips. UKCA certified.

No clinic, no commission. A company called Smart Hearing does exactly this. £149.

I've tested them against Phonak — for mild to moderate loss, I couldn't tell the difference."

Dr. Whitfield's ranking:

Audiologist 2

Dr. Richard Hartley

28 years. Former head of audiology at a private clinic group. Left the industry in 2023.

"I earned 12% commission on every hearing aid I sold. On a £3,000 pair, that's £360 in my pocket.

On the basic range, £144. Which one do you think I was trained to recommend?"

"Ten minutes on the hearing test. Forty minutes on the sales pitch.

Show the premium range first. Make the basic range sound like a downgrade.

Most people panic — they've just been told they're losing their hearing. They pick the expensive one.

I was a salesman in a white coat."

"A woman came in with her husband. He was 79.

Couldn't hear his grandchildren. She asked how much.

I told her £2,800. She started crying.

They had to cancel their holiday to pay for it. I earned £336 commission.

I handed in my notice the following Monday."

"The hearing aid I sold that woman costs about £80 to £100 to manufacture. Same Knowles receivers in every brand.

The other £2,700 is the shop, the staff, my commission, the television adverts. That's what I couldn't live with anymore.

Now that I'm free to say what I actually think — here's how I'd rank every option in the UK."

Dr. Hartley's ranking:

"Smart Hearing uses the same Knowles receivers I sold at the clinic for £3,000. I've opened both up.

Same components. The only difference is the £2,850 of overhead I helped charge people for 28 years.

NHS at two because it's free and decent — but you'll wait up to 14 months. Oticon and Phonak are extraordinary technology, but for most people you're paying £3,000+ for features that make no difference to your daily life."

Audiologist 3

Dr. Janet Morris

30 years NHS and private sector. Retired 2024. Formerly senior audiologist at two NHS trusts.

"My ranking depends on one thing: can the patient afford to go private? Because the gap between free and £3,000 is where most people get stuck.

They can't afford the clinic. They can't wait 14 months.

So they go to Amazon. And that's where the real damage happens."

"What Amazon sells are amplifiers, not hearing aids. A real hearing aid needs a UKCA-certified digital processing chip — the component that separates voices from background noise.

That chip alone costs around £80. Add the receiver, the microphone, the casing — a real hearing aid costs about £100 in components.

If the entire device on Amazon costs £39, it is physically impossible for that chip to be inside it. What you're buying is a speaker and a battery in a plastic shell."

"But here's what breaks my heart. The person tries Amazon.

Everything is loud and painful and muffled. They think: hearing aids don't work.

They put them in a drawer. They give up.

They go years without hearing properly. Some develop depression.

Some develop early cognitive decline. About two in three people who buy a hearing device on Amazon never try hearing aids again.

Millions of people sitting in silence because a £39 amplifier convinced them nothing works."

"If you've tried Amazon and given up — you weren't trying hearing aids. Please don't let that experience be the end of your story."

"Because there is something in between. Last year, a colleague sent me a pair of hearing aids. £149 for the pair.

A company called Smart Hearing. I assumed they were amplifiers.

At that price, what else could they be?"

"I opened them up. Knowles receivers.

The same ones I'd been fitting in the NHS for thirty years. Same digital processing chip.

Multi-channel sound filtering — the kind that separates voices from background noise. Not amplification.

Proper hearing aid technology. UKCA certified as a medical device."

"I looked into the company. Founded by a man called David Taylor.

His father was in his seventies — couldn't afford Boots on his pension, wouldn't wait over a year for the NHS. Taylor had worked in the hearing aid industry.

He knew what the components actually cost. Same Knowles receivers.

Same chips. No shop.

No commission. No area manager.

No television adverts. Warehouse in Stoke-on-Trent.

That's the £149."

"Rechargeable. Fully invisible — sits completely inside the ear canal. 45-day trial.

Two-year guarantee. A woman called Diane answered my email with technical questions within four hours.

Specific. Knowledgeable.

Not a chatbot."

"I recommended it to my own father. He's 84.

Stubborn as they come. Wouldn't wear NHS aids.

Wouldn't pay £2,500 at a clinic. Now wearing Smart Hearing every day.

'Should've done this years ago,' he told me last week."

Dr. Morris's ranking:

"Oticon at two because the technology is genuinely the best available — but at £3,800, most people simply can't do it. NHS at three because the wait is unacceptable. 14 months is not a waiting list, it's an abandonment.

Phonak at four — brilliant sound, but the commission-driven sales at Boots make me uncomfortable recommending them."

The Combined Ranking

Three audiologists. 85 years of experience. Interviewed separately.

Here is how their rankings compared:

Two out of three ranked Smart Hearing first. The third — a specialist in severe hearing loss — ranked Phonak first but said Smart Hearing is what she'd recommend for the 80% of people with mild to moderate loss.

All three agreed Amazon doesn't belong on the list. They disagreed on everything in between.

What Our Readers Said About Smart Hearing